Date: 26 Apr 2007 22:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelbob.livejournal.com
Yup. It's been true to some extent for some time. Vista is significantly more onerous than XP about this stuff, but still not as bad as they wanted to make it.

Date: 27 Apr 2007 01:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] not-croaker.livejournal.com
Yep.

What they originally wanted was a law that mandated every motherboard, every hard drive, everything, have a little chip on it that checks with the OS constantly for a clearance code, and watches every process in the CPU - basically hardwiring DRM into every computer made, no matter what OS was actually installed. And of course, it being hardwired, it wouldn't work with an OS that didn't have an authorization code....

Date: 27 Apr 2007 14:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelbob.livejournal.com
Yup. Now they've backed off on that to where Intel is trying to make hardware that will do that, but it doesn't look like it's going to be mandated.

So "rogue" hardware (like, say, every piece currently for sale) will still exist, but there will be safeguards (a la X-Box) for a lot of stuff to keep you from using it easily for unintended purposes.

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516 17181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 6 January 2026 11:47
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios