http://indianapolismonthly.com/monthly/article.asp?articleid=3
An incredibly mean-spirited review of GenCon.
I'm writing a letter to the editor as we speak.
An incredibly mean-spirited review of GenCon.
I'm writing a letter to the editor as we speak.
no subject
Date: 25 Aug 2006 02:19 (UTC)seems like he was a gamer himself as a child and tormented by the school bullies, so now he's got his panties in a knot because it's so accepted now.
this guy needs a spinning back kick to the head. and a jab to the adams apple.
no subject
Date: 25 Aug 2006 02:29 (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 Aug 2006 02:54 (UTC)http://indianapolismonthly.com/monthly/article.asp?articleid=3
I attended Gen Con, infact I had a booth at the art show. I didn't see a realitive point being made in this article beyond gay bashing and gamer bashing.
That article was an incredibly long-winded mean-spirited review of GenCon, and completely failed to mention, the other events, talent (as in Larry Elmore, Mark Poole and other big named artists and television personalities - such as Kevin Sorbo, Gigi Edgley, Steve from Ghosthunters, or the Mythbusters crew - who appeared there), game previews (Eve & World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade), contests and THE ARTSHOW.
Also it seems like Tony Rehagen was a little too focused on Mykal Wells for this article to appear as nothing more than perhaps a lovers spat? or maybe Tony Rehagen is homophobic and was just reaffirming his testostorone induced delusion of being manly.
He just kept going on and on to where I couldn't even finish the article beyond skimming over it to the end.
no subject
Date: 25 Aug 2006 03:03 (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 Aug 2006 03:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 Aug 2006 03:12 (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 Aug 2006 15:11 (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 Aug 2006 12:38 (UTC)It's great.
no subject
Date: 25 Aug 2006 12:45 (UTC)My guess is that the journalist decided to, in an effort to understand and cover Gen Con, follow around a "typical gamer." Not a bad tactic, but it does ignore some of the other people and elements to be found at the con, and therefore isn't as thorough an article as perhaps it ought to be. It focuses a bit much on the stereotype and doesn't show other sides of the story.