amul: (Default)
[personal profile] amul
I've been spending most of the day reading up on the wiretapping thing. As near as I can tell, and this is after about five solid hours of reading news articles and interviews, the argument goes something like this:

The Law: You cannot wiretap a US citizen without a written court order.

Nixon: Well, that's only for the FBI. I hereby empower a new branch of government to do the exact same thing as the old branches, but without all those messy legal complications.

The Law: Nice try, but you still can't tap a citizen's phone without an expressly written warrant stating who, why, when, and for how long.

Reagan: Well, what if I try to buy you off?

The Law: Then I'm just going to have to nominate a subcommittee to watch both of us and make sure we don't become corrupt.

Clinton: But it'd be really nice if we could.

The Law: See, there's this little thing called "due process." We kind of founded an entire country based on the fact that we didn't have it before.

George W: Fuck that noise. I'm just going to write a law that says I can.

The Law: You can't do that. You're not the Legislative Branch.

George W: ....and then I'm going to create another FBI-like group to watch over the FBI and the NSA and do all the things that my shiny new law lets them do.

The Law: No, you don't understand. You can't do that. That's an impeachable offense. It says so, right here.

George W: Nonsense, you get impeached for blowjobs, not crimes against the country. Hey, guys, look! I made a law!

Telecoms: Ooooooh. Pretty.


Pardon me if that version seems a little biased to you.

Date: 7 Feb 2006 14:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] not-croaker.livejournal.com
Pretty darn close, yeah.

You forgot the part where 'The Law' says "unless you ask us nicely afterwards, and we say it's ok" in the first bit.

And Carter, etc.

Date: 7 Feb 2006 20:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amul.livejournal.com
Uh, really? That did not come up in my exploration yesterday.

Date: 8 Feb 2006 03:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] not-croaker.livejournal.com
Yeah. The FISA law specifically allows for retroactive warrants.

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516 17181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 21 January 2026 10:46
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios